Saturday 13 March 2010
29 Rabi al-Awwal 1431

AhlulBayt Islamic Mission

AIM ISLAM

 
Parachinar: The Silent Massacre
Written by Ali Jawad   
Wednesday, 15 April 2009 03:04
Parachinar: The Silent MassacreTucked away between soaring snowy-peaks and deep gorges in the fragile north-western region of Pakistan is the tiny town of Parachinar.
 
Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, one of the more charismatic leaders in the history of this troubled nation, is said to have called it Pakistan’s own “Switzerland”. Humbled by towering snow-tipped mountains and covered by endless fruit orchards, Parachinar’s natural charm is breathtaking. Its narrative for the last two years however, has been anything but reflective of the serene beauty of its surroundings.
 
Strangled by recurring sieges laid on the town, and a plight concealed from the consciences of the outside world by a silent media, the lives of Parachinaris have been a tale of untold suffering. Since early 2007, violence has gripped the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), which holds Parachinar, and the surrounding North-West Frontier Province (NWFP) leading to the deaths of hundreds. Even more have been left homeless and without means of sustenance with homes and local businesses regularly torched down just because their owners happen to fall under the wrong “sect”. Despite the periodical nature of sectarian violence in these regions, the unrelenting wave of the recent outbreak has been by far the bloodiest in recent memory.
 
Tensions began in April 2007 when a procession of Shias came under fire from fanatical Wahhabis who view Shia Muslims as heretics. What followed on from that initial attack however, has been a systematic attempt to wipe out Parachinar of its’ Shia presence. Shias represent a majority of the population in Parachinar constituting over fifty-percent (50%) of the population. They also have a considerable presence in neighbouring towns in the north-west of the country with a strong and historic Hazara presence further north of the FATA.
 
During the rule of General Zia-ul-Haq, the Kurram Agency (which hosts the town of Parachinar) came under increased focus for its strategic location as it provided the shortest route from within Pakistan to the Afghan capital, Kabul. Jutting out into Afghanistan almost like an island peninsula, it was famously nicknamed the “Parrot’s Beak” by US forces during the Soviet-Afghan War and was regularly used as a launching-pad by American-backed "jihadists" to strike out at the Soviets. As a result of this strategic importance, towns in the FATA region were flooded by inflows of Wahhabist and Salafist anti-Soviet “jihadists” well-known for their hatred towards Shias.
 
Following on from the early and comparably minimal killings unleashed in April, armed Wahhabi groups have since caved in on the local Shias of Parachinar from all sides. The Shia residents of Parachinar have repeatedly claimed that Wahhabi elements from Afghanistan have joined in the attacks against the town’s Shias, but these cries have been met by deaf ears in Islamabad’s Pakistani central government.
 
An all-out attack against the Shias of Parachinar has been underway for a long time now; even Sunni locals seen to be “friendly” towards Shias have not been spared in this maelstrom of killing. Gruesome images of beheaded and mutilated bodies, with arms and legs chopped off from corpses, have surfaced on the Internet since the outbreak of violence. Such showings of utter barbarity are not altogether unique. The collective massacres of Hazara Shias in next door Afghanistan - more notably in Mazari Sharif in 1998 where during a 48-hour period over 8,000 Hazaras were mercilessly slaughtered - evoke similar images of ruthlessness. By the end of the killing spree then, corpses littered the streets of the city after express orders were given out by the Taliban government for the dead to be left unburied.
 
Eerily reminiscent of massacres conducted against Afghan Shias in the recent past, Riaz Ali Toori, a villager from Parachinar, protested in a letter to a Pakistani daily:
 
“Today Parachinar is burning: daily bodies of more than five beheaded persons reach Parachinar. The situation of Parachinar is getting worse day by day and so is the life of all people living there. It’s a matter of great sorrow and shock that Pakistan, in spite of bringing Fata into the mainstream of the country, has been pushed into fighting a continuous war and facing terror.” (Letters to the Editor, The Dawn, April 08 2008)
 
Surprisingly, at a time when the “civilized” world is on a so-called offensive against “terror”, coverage of the sorrow-filled plight of Parachinaris within western media has been periodical at best. The reasons for this are unclear. May be it is because Parachinar, fatefully, does not sit over barrels of oil; or perhaps our probing of the historical context behind these massacres will lead us to discover that Parachinar is yet another piece of anecdotal evidence of the much disregarded “blowback” stemming from the Soviet era.
 
In July of 2008, the New York Times ran a piece highlighting the rise of “sectarian conflict” in Parachinar. By then, the town had already been subject to a siege that had spanned for months; food and medical supplies had been in severe shortage after the main Thal-Peshawar highway leading to the town was blocked off by armed groups. The New York Times article carried the story of Asif Hussain, a Sunni driver, in a relief convoy headed for Parachinar; the convoy was ambushed, and its drivers taken captive. Asif Hussain was let off after convincing his captors that he was Sunni, the other eight drivers were not as lucky. (Power Rising Taliban Besiege Pakistani Shiites, New York Times, July 26 2008)
 
Today, the violence has spread out over a larger radius extending all the way through to the southern tips of the NWFP. Attacks on Shias in Hangu, Chakwal and as far south as Deira Ismail Khan have become a thing of the norm. Late in August of last year, a suicide bomber detonated himself inside the DI Khan hospital killing thirty-two Shia followers who had come to claim the remains of one of their leaders slain earlier in the day.
 
As recently as last week, another suicide bomber struck a Shia mosque in Chakwal instantly killing thirty and leaving hundreds more injured. The systematic targeting of followers of the Shia sect in various regions of Pakistan, more specifically in the north-west of the country, amounts to nothing other than a project of ethnic cleansing. According to a reputed scholar of the phenomenon of ethnic cleansing, Drazen Petrovic, he defines it as such:
 
“ethnic cleansing is a well-defined policy of a particular group of persons to systematically eliminate another group from a given territory on the basis of religious, ethnic or national origin. Such a policy involves violence and is very often connected with military operations. It is to be achieved by all means, from discrimination to extermination …”
 
The above definition provides an almost perfect fit to the present situation on the ground in Parachinar. If international silence continues as it has over the last two years, the same story will have repeated across many towns in the FATA and NWFP.
 
That the Pakistani government holds principal blame for its failure to restrain the killings is indisputable and goes without mention. Wider global apathy to an ongoing project of ethnic cleansing however, is certainly not comprehensible and deserves a great deal of mention.
 
Parachinar deserves better. And the people of Parachinar certainly deserve better. The least we can do is speak out and urge our leaders to press the Pakistani government to bring an immediate end to these massacres. Then, and only then perhaps, can it be said that we have extended a hand to the forgotten victims of Parachinar.


----
Ali Jawad is a political activist and a member of the AhlulBayt Islamic Mission (AIM)
Comments (8)Add Comment
...
written by khalz, April 15, 2009
when will you people give this shi'ite victhimhood a rest? the shias have also killed many sunnis in parachinar

the article is incredibly biased. totally one-sided
...
written by Ali Jawad, April 16, 2009
To khalz:

To begin with, thanks for your feedback.

Having noted your points, I would also ask you to kindly take note of the following:

First, the central objective of the above article was to raise awareness on the ongoing crisis in Parachinar. I reject any sort of political sectarianism, especially involving violence.

Second, to overlook the causes for the outbreak of clashes, and to instead suggest a mentality of victimhood on the part of the Shias, in this specific instance, is to be simplistic.

Reactions - even if involving violations against innocents (this is what you seem to be suggesting) and these are definitely criminal - need to be viewed against a proper context. This context in my opinion, as put forward in the article, is a project of ethnic cleansing.

The internet is replete with evidence of merciless beheadings and systemic brutality whose principal target are the Shias of Parachinar.

Last, I do not see what's happening in Parachinar as a war between "Shias" and "Sunnis". Contrary to that, I feel it is a duty to speak out very strongly against the role and heavy influence of Wahhabi/Salafist armed militias in the orchestrating of such conflicts.

Our failure to speak out against what they are doing will result in exactly what these fanatic zealots want i.e. an escalation to a Sunni-Shia conflict, or at least the perception that this is the nature of the current conflict.

I hope we can both work to ensure that they do not achieve this end.
...
written by Mike, April 16, 2009
The comment by Khalz is rediculous. One wonders which News Channel he tunes to!!

Khalz, Please, the world is witness of the senseless murders of Wahaabi Fanatics from Hospitals/Mosques in Pakistan to Schools/markets in Baghdad. This butchers have lost the sense of life in their hearts, a striking similarity to the Khawarij, once upon a time.

It is so commendable, that, despite all this murders of Shias everywhere, the Shiite populations are so cognizant of the greater enemies of Islam and resist any reactions to these cowardly acts.

Those who adhere and hold fast to the Message of Muhammed (SAW) and have Ali (peace be upon him) as their master, know their way around battlefields......be REST assured...!!
...
written by concerned, April 16, 2009
The conflict in Pakistain is a conspiracy to bring about a division at the hands of those who want to eridicate the truth but those who truly love brotherhood will never allow this to happen. Brotherhood if applied in the proper context without hate would be a great asset against those who plot to destroy humanity. It is the responsibility for every human to speak out against voilence, injustice, or oppression and in by doing so humanity may be able to redeem itself on the Day of Judgement.
...
written by abid shah, April 17, 2009
I respect the author’s point of view. He has raised the Parachinar issue on international forum. The incompetent Pakistani government and our media have ignored the suffering of almost million human beings. The recent surrender of civilian government and security forces in Swat will trigger the situation. The so called Nizam-e Adl will never bring lasting peace but will aggravate the brutality and anarchy. Now the whole FATA and NWFP are nearly in the control of so called Islamic warriors. What will be the future of the peoples of Kurram Parachinar in this arising scenario? Parachinar is squeezing and the future is dead end (God forbid).
The same situation was created in the last decade of Nineteen century when the Turis of Kurram had no choice except inviting British Rulers in near by Kohat district to take over the valley to ensure the safety and security. This is just to remind that Kurram was part of Afghanistan at that period and rulers of those days not even failed but supported the insurgents. Now the rulers of Pakistan has no writ in the area and the security forces in the area are either limited to their camps or supporting the so called warriors.
We have NATO forces on the Afghan side and if Pakistani government fails to take concrete steps to open the road blocked by so called Jehadis then the history will repeat and Kurrmis will have no choice except to invite NATO forces to take over the area and such take over will not be limited to Kurram.
One thing I want to remind to respectable author that the issue was never sectarian and so called warriors are tainting it with sectarianism to gain sympathy of religious elements in security forces and intelligence agencies. The current on going crises is purely related to the over all situation in the area and the peoples of Parachinar are suffering because their faith and local interest is not matching the so called Jehadis, the offspring’s of AQ.
When Mr. Ali Jawad the author of this caliber is presenting Parachinar issue in sectarian frame, then the International coalition against terrorism will also ignore like the bigoted Pakistani administration.
...
written by Ali, April 23, 2009
The author should be commended for writing this very useful piece. I do agree with the other comment: the issue is not sectarian. The use of the term 'sectarian' (as is done very often in the media) stresses religious at the expense of political. The real game is about power.

The Parachinar crisis should be viewed in the context of the larger game in the FATA region, and the entanglements between the Establishment, the Civilian Government, the US, and other regional forces. Taliban and their local supporters would not have created such trouble for the Parachinaris - at least, while the Taliban were fighting against the state forces - had the Parachinaris allowed them an easy, regular passage into Afghanistan.

The Parachinaris did not want to do that for at least two reasons: One, they did not want to side with the Taliban. Taliban's religious extremism and the mess they create wherever they go is more than obvious. Two, and equally important, they did not want their area to be targeted by the US bombardment, as happening in other parts of FATA. The initial attacks on Shias (and Imam Hussain, actually revered by both Sunnis and Shias) around the celebration of the Prophet's birthday in 2007 should be read as just a provocation, rather than a cause.

The recent Taliban advancements are also alarming. One wonders why the half-million strong Army is not doing anything against these few thousand militants? The establishment reacts differently and much forcefully to the nationalist insurgency in the southwestern province of Balochistan. Why the differential treatment? Why the unwillingness to tackle the Taliban?

Any analysis of Taliban, however, also gets complicated considering the numerous militant factions that have emerged in the last few years. Some of them are Taliban (with some experience of fighting in Afghanistan before and after the invasion). Others are local tribal militas. The Pakistani media are alleging various foreign interests to behind these groups. In different versions, they claim that India, America, Israel, etc. are trying to destablize Pakistan.

Some say that the Army did not like the way Washington imposed Bhutto/Zardari on them last year. For at least two reasons: One, the Army wants Washington to deal with them directly (the decisions and resources should be channeled through them). Two, the Army thinks that the US/Israel/India planted Bhutto/Zardari in Pakistan with an agenda to neutralize Pakistan's nuclear assets. The current turmoil, they say, is part of that agenda where these countries are supporting the militant factions to destablize Pakistan to such an extent that its nuclear assets would be considered in danger and put under Charter 7 of the UN and ordered to be placed under IAEA's supervision. There is so much fog around the current turmoil that any straightforward analysis of the conflict is bound to be unsatisfactory.
...
written by razia sayeda, September 01, 2009
Why don't the cowardly Talibans fight against Israeli atrocities against Sunni muslims in Palestines instead of killing poor shia muslims. Adherents of that son of a whore muawiyah who was of jewish lineage. Maybe these Taliban sons of bitches are zionists in disguise. Take one look at their evil faces and confirm that its the truth. Evil personified!
THANK GOD WE LIVE IN CIVILIZED INDIA.
maybe India should remove all peace-loving shias from pakistan and bomb it to kingdom come
...
written by kaiser, October 05, 2009
First, I would like to congratulate author on writing such nice article.
Second , I feel sorry for ill mentality people like khalz,no wounder such people approve every thing in name of Islam & planting ideas of "virgins" in innocent mind who happily blow themsleves.
Now Coming to talibans,What they are & who they are, its now open secret & all know its trained & funed by ISI & wahabis money. No wounder Talibans never get foothold in any area of Pakistan where aarmy wasnt there,first army go to certain area,then Taliban rises,then destruction of local infrastructures like police, local systems ,then killing of local elders who dare to raise voice against them....& in last when ISI get money to "clean" talibans,they do happily & the same phenomena is repeated soem where else. Its all about Money,& money in form of ££$$$ etc, & nothing what Talibans do has relation in million miles to Islam.
NOw regarding Parachinar, Author forget to mention one thing,why talibans fail to get foothold in Shia area.Answer is very simple,the local tribe TURI which happen to be Shia is against Taliban & they havent allowed them to carry out their heinous crimes & thats why many quarters making it sectarian strife.Talibans would be even not allow even Turis happen to be sunni,as in many other areas of Pakistan & afghanistan talibans are not allowed by local people/tribes.
One point more,which I want you all to ponder...Weapons & ammuniations are not some thing small which could be hidden easily or transported easily,that need to be transported by lots of vehicles & now question arises,how come taliban got so much weapons? Weapon falling from sky?definetly not...there must be SOME ONE who supply them....& answer is self evident that Talibans only get strong in areas where army go in there in name of "peace.
salam

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Search AIMISLAM.com

Prayer Timetable in UK

For

Quick Links









Advertisement

http://aimislam.com/files/advertisement/shiasource.png

http://www.aimislam.com/files/advertisement/arabic-courses.gif

http://www.aimislam.com/files/advertisement/islamicartisticdesign.gif

 

Global Coverage

Locations of visitors to this page